Mars Express Images and General Subjects

Monday, July 4, 2011

HAARP and GPR

HAARP and GPR.

GPR - Ground Penetrating Radar. Usually, a spacecraft like the NASA/MRO/SHARAD transmits a signal to the surface and receives the return echo. This echo creates a vertical profile from the surface to about 3300 feet below.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/spacecraft/sc-instru-sharad.html

Transmitted power - 10 Watts.
Frequency - 15 to 25 MHz. A transmitted HF signal begins at 15Mhz and stops at 25Mhz. A “Chirped” signal.

A SHARAD image. This is a reduced size image.
http://marsesa.9f.com/slide_shows/SHARAD_A5/r_0520802_001_ss11_700_a_b_D1A.jpg

Better. I want to see this image down to resolution limits, around 50 feet or better.
http://marsesa.9f.com/slide_shows/SHARAD_A5/r_0520802_001_ss11_700_a_b_D2A.jpg

HAARP.
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/index.html

http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/factSheet.html

Transmitted Power - 3.6 MW

Another site. Real basic information.
http://137.229.36.56/

This research facility also transmits HF frequencies to the Ionosphere and to study Auroral activity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(astronomy)

A hypothesis. The HAARP program is performing radar profiles of the Atmosphere like SHARAD. Instead of transmiting HF signals to the ground, HAARP is transmiting HF to the Atmosphere. The North pole is the most active region of Earth. A region where the Earth’s magnetic field interacts with Solar energy and Solar high energy particles. The Earth’s magnetic field is strongest at the poles.

Something to consider. Instead of transmitting to the atmosphere, this HAARP can transmit to the ground. GPR or Ground Penetrating Radar. Another possibility. Submarine communications. Communicate with submarines using transmissions thru the ground. This submarine communication may only be one way, the submarines do not have the transmitting power to send a return signal.

HAARP is not the only research station. There are similar stations elsewhere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIPAS_Observatory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EISCAT

This station is capable of transmitting 190 MW.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sura_Ionospheric_Heating_Facility

When it comes to public data, this data is very “weak”. Noisy insignificant information. Data when viewed makes one say, “that’s it?”.

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Comet Halley

An image of Comet Halley. Taken in 1986 by the Giotto Spacecraft.
http://sse.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/display.cfm?IM_ID=11423

http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=31878

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/images/halley.html

Size - 9mi x 5mi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halley's_Comet

The Camera. Resolution, 11m (36ft) per pixel at 500km (310mi).
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/experimentDisplay.do?id=1985-056A-01

Source image. A reduced size blurry image. Distance from Giotto - 596km (370mi). Resolution - 13m (43ft) per pixel assuming a linear proportionality. This image should be better than shown.

Better. There is something going on with the surrounding dust/water vapor. Large structures. There are intelligent designs. Dynamically changing and it’s 3D in nature. Regardless of viewing angle, there will be a design.

An area of interest.

Right half.

Left Half.

Another area.

Right half.

Left half.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Titan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_(moon)

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/spacecraft/cassiniorbiterinstruments/instrumentscassiniradar/

“Perhaps one day it may even uncover the extraordinary"

"Who knows, maybe there are aliens out there somewhere that don't see like we humans do, but more like the RADAR does!"

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Comet Hartley 2

Comet Hartley 2.

Comet???

Not in a traditional “dirty snowball” sense. This is an outdated term. But I do remember this term from years ago when comets were a theoretical thing. We are now visiting them.

Comet Hartley 2 looks like an Asteroid.

The out gassing is claimed to be CO2. It maybe water vapor also.

Preliminary observations.

This asteroid underwent a violent process. It seems like a movement of molten mass that cooled and solidified. This explains the smooth area.

Origins of this asteroid is most likely the asteroid belt. Millions of asteroids.

Try to visualize this, take a hot molten spherical mass - an irregular blob. A spinning blob (It is rotating at a 18 hour period - I am assuming end over end). As this blob spins, it begins to elongate due to centripetal forces - ok stretch. As this molten blob cools, it solidifies rapidly to the shape we see.

So, we are seeing something quickly frozen in time and it’s traveling at speed.

Original image. My source image. A reduced size, noisy image. I am certain there are better images in private. Color images.

The Deep Impact spacecraft does have color filters. This is a good decent 12 inch diameter telescope/camera.
http://deepimpact.umd.edu/tech/hri.html

Better. Very busy. I can see this in the original noisy image. Artworks or sculpture. Maybe custom made just for this encounter by the Deep Impact spacecraft.

Another image. Note enhanced area. Something of a technological nature or process is shown here.
http://marsesa.9f.com/slide_shows/Hartley/20101118_AHearn1b_E2A.jpg

An area of interest. Very noticeable.

A reflected view. A constant theme, half portraits.

A couple of questions. Two possibilities.

1. This Asteroid/Comet is occupied by choice. “They” like to live there. Free to come and go as they please.

2. “They” are trapped on this Asteroid. (Why would anyone live on a Asteroid hurling thru space?).

Supposedly, this Asteroid/Comet will break up in another 700 years.

“Barring a catastrophic breakup or major splitting event, the comet should be able to survive up to another 100 apparitions (~700 years) at its current rate of mass loss.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/103P/Hartley

http://epoxi.umd.edu/index.shtml

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Apollo 17 Encounter

Apollo 17. The last and final Apollo lunar mission - 1972. Someone else was with them. The astronauts took notice. However, astronauts Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt were not to interact in anyway. A rule that all Apollo astronauts were following, they were looking indirectly.

A unknown hovering object approaching the astronauts.

Harrison Schmitt was well aware of the “visitor” .Note cross hair. Because the cameras were point in shoot instruments, I find it unusual to precisely aim that cross hair, unless Harrison Schmitt was guided or directed.

Note unknown hovering vehicle, top of visor.

Another image. I tried to reduce the Sun’s glare. Note “hatch” just on the right.

The visitor. A sketch to help identify this snakelike entity or “alien”.

It seems this “visitor” is wearing a headdress. Probably both ornamental and functional.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Schmitt

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Cernan

Both of them are in their mid 70s. Still not talking.

Only two possibilities.
1. They will not talk. Strictly adhering to instructions.

2. They do not remember or can not remember any “alien” encounters.

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Real UFOs

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Apollo

The Apollo Program. The beginnings of this program led by Wernher Von Braun, the V2. A war time project. I say around 1944 or so.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skq5gy5RHgo

I will say at this time that I completely understand the war against Germany. I have chosen sides, Germany before 1945.

25 years later. If Germany would of won the war, I say this launch would have been in Germany or even somewhere in Africa. Swastika flag on the rocket in all. A Nationalist Socialist program. An all German project with German speaking Astronauts. Funded by zero interest loans or even grants. Taxes not needed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPXKdABiS9g

Wernher von Braun. Adolf Hitler called him “Professor”. After all, Wernher von Braun was part of the “Intelligentsia” class. A word used by Adolf Hitler.

The Apollo/V2 program was taken over by the “Allies” and brought to the USA. I am beginning to realize that the Apollo Lunar landings will be an unique event. We will never send people back to the Moon, Mars or elsewhere. No Lunar bases and no more manned missions beyond low Earth orbit.

That is why we are doing this 40 years later. Staying homebound.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Space_Station

NASA’s current missions. Conservative or even scaled back. http://www.nasa.gov/missions/current/index.html

Except for this mission. Proof we can really spend the money (in capitalist terms) if we need to. A program funded by interest bearing loans. If not a loan, then taxes. It is said these taxes are only to pay off the interest on the National debt. Taxes and loans are really one of the same. A strategy.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/index.html

If I had my way, I have ideas of my own on where to send that mission.

I find it not unusual that NASA is totally ignoring the Centripetal Force rotating space station concept. This idea will really open up the Solar System to manned missions. I did a Google on the Rotating space station concept. I ended up with a college project run by students. I will look for this link later. I did come across the “It’s too difficult” excuse here and there.

There is a lot of stories on super advance propulsion projects. “Anti - Gravity” and such. But, this is just speculation and even disinformation. Disinformation avoiding the real basic issues like Rockets both liquid and Nuclear propelled. It’s very possible that we as Human Beings, Rocket propulsion is the best we can do. Not because we are dumb, it’s because we can only work with materials and energy sources found on Earth.

If there is any advance materials and energy sources out there, it’s only thru further exploration of the Solar System, manned or unmanned, that these sources can be found if there is any. Unless there was a past technological civilization here on Earth that has discovered advance propulsion technologies. This is also speculation and story telling at this time.

Another possibility. “Someone” else has already developed something better than Rockets. The Solar System is 4.5 Billion years old. Our present “high tech” civilization is only 160 years old, since the 1850s the beginnings of the Industrial Revolution.

A real unknown.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TxbG-My-RI

It is real because that object is emitting energy and effecting the surrounding atmosphere.

Maybe we can learn from “them”.